After five years, the European Union has appointed a new envoy to mediate negotiations between Serbia and Kosovo. Danish diplomat Peter Sørensen officially assumes the role today, replacing Miroslav Laj?ák. Unlike his predecessor, Sørensen will focus solely on the dialogue between Belgrade and Priština, rather than broader regional issues.
His appointment has so far been met with a largely positive response, with analysts noting his extensive experience in the Balkans. Sørensen, 57, previously served in Kosovo under the UN mission and has held diplomatic roles in Serbia, North Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. His familiarity with the region is seen as an advantage, as he does not require extensive briefings on its history and key figures.
A shift in perception
One notable difference from his predecessor is Sørensen’s nationality. Coming from Denmark—a country that recognises Kosovo’s independence—he is expected to be viewed as more neutral in Priština. This contrasts with Laj?ák, a Slovak, and EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell, a Spaniard, both from countries that do not recognise Kosovo. Their perceived bias led to repeated criticism from Kosovo’s leadership, including President Vjosa Osmani.
While Sørensen’s appointment removes that issue, he faces immediate challenges due to the political climate. Kosovo is preparing for elections, and Serbia is dealing with political uncertainty following the resignation of its prime minister. Experts predict limited progress in negotiations during Sørensen’s first six months.
EU’s limited leverage
Adnan ?erimagi? of the European Stability Initiative in Berlin believes Sørensen’s success will depend not only on his approach but also on what the EU can offer Serbia and Kosovo. “The enlargement process is effectively stalled, and without clear incentives, even the most capable envoy will face difficulties,” he told Radio Free Europe.
Sources in Brussels suggest that real progress will depend on the level of commitment from major EU powers, particularly Germany and France. However, both countries are currently dealing with domestic political challenges, meaning Sørensen may not have the strong backing needed to push for a breakthrough.
Despite these obstacles, EU officials insist there will be no backtracking on agreements already reached. The 2023 Brussels Agreement on normalisation and its implementation annex remain key points in the negotiations. Some critics argue that Laj?ák failed to secure a formal signing of the agreement, with much of his tenure spent managing crises rather than advancing a long-term solution.
The role of the United States
Another key factor will be the involvement of the United States. Washington has consistently played a role in the Serbia-Kosovo talks, and its current envoy for the Western Balkans, Alexander Kasanof, has urged both sides to fulfil their previous commitments.
Since 2011, negotiations between Serbia and Kosovo have produced numerous agreements, many of which remain only partially implemented. The EU has repeatedly linked progress in the talks to both countries’ European integration prospects, but without tangible steps forward, the process remains at a standstill.
Sørensen’s appointment signals the EU’s commitment to keeping the dialogue high on its agenda. However, with little political momentum on either side and limited EU leverage, his tenure is likely to be an uphill battle.
